<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Compucall Web Marketing &#187; Search Network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.compucall-usa.com/tag/search-network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.compucall-usa.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 08:34:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>he</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google finally blesses us with a tweak to the Quality Score</title>
		<link>http://www.compucall-usa.com/2008/08/25/google-finally-blesses-us-with-a-tweak-to-the-quality-score/</link>
		<comments>http://www.compucall-usa.com/2008/08/25/google-finally-blesses-us-with-a-tweak-to-the-quality-score/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality Score]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Slap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Network]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.compucall-usa.com/?p=333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do You remember the Google &#8220;Quality Score Slap&#8221; of 2005? Who ever was there, will never forget the &#8220;tiny&#8221; change that Google made to the Adwords system. Well guess what? They did it again! The big difference between 2005 and 2008 is that we are now (the Adwords users/sharks) ready and welcome this change with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do You remember the Google &#8220;Quality Score Slap&#8221; of 2005? Who ever was there, will never forget the &#8220;tiny&#8221; change that Google made to the Adwords system. Well guess what? They did it again!</p>
<p>The big difference between 2005 and 2008 is that we are now (the Adwords users/sharks) ready and welcome this change with wide open hands.<span id="more-333"></span></p>
<p>Why? We&#8217;ve learned what Adwords wants and look for it as well as build our new accounts by their requirements &#8211; Relevant and targeted campaigns from the ad to the landing page with, on one hand, friendly code and, on the other, a strong business model.</p>
<p>This all brings us to this latest change in the Adwords Quality Score. I can honestly say Google has listened and blessed us.</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s this change about?</p>
<p>We were, until just a little while ago, in an era where the Quality Score was 3 years old and not efficient enough for the level of professionalism and sophistication and work that people are presently doing in Adwords (that&#8217;s not to say everyone out there has a high level). From now on, the Quality Score will be calculate in real time, per the source of traffic &#8211; <a title="Google Search Network" href="http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=6119&amp;topic=82" target="_blank">search networks</a> &#8211; for each ad that&#8217;s being triggered taking into consideration its real-time keyword history performance. On the basis of that calculation, Adwords will then determine how much needs to be paid to get on to the first page results &#8211; Yay &#8211; no more &#8220;inactive keywords&#8221; : )</p>
<p>So now we can enjoy better targeting of our good ads and a higher cost for our bad ads which means it will make the competition more stringent and accurate. Oh, let&#8217;s also not forget that this will also make Google a whole lot more money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.compucall-usa.com/2008/08/25/google-finally-blesses-us-with-a-tweak-to-the-quality-score/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

